CAPABILITIES · SPECIALIST SAMPLE MATRICES · INTERSTITIAL FLUID

Tissue-level biomarker signal, without the biopsy

Tissue-level biomarker signal, without the biopsy

Interstitial fluid gives direct access to the local molecular state of tissue. Microneedle sampling makes that biology accessible without the pain, scarring and repeat-sampling limits of punch biopsy.

We have validated dermal interstitial fluid biomarker quantification on NULISA in partnership with Ascilion, using their PELSA microneedle device.

Interstitial fluid gives direct access to the local molecular state of tissue. Microneedle sampling makes that biology accessible without the pain, scarring and repeat-sampling limits of punch biopsy.

We have validated dermal interstitial fluid biomarker quantification on NULISA in partnership with Ascilion, using their PELSA microneedle device.

Talk to a scientist about your matrix

Talk to a scientist about your matrix

Request a feasibility pilot

Absolute quantitation for 150+ markers from microvolume input

Absolute quantitation for 150+ markers from microvolume input

Absolute quantitation for 150+ markers from microvolume input

Validated dISF workflow on NULISA

Validated dISF workflow on NULISA

Validated dISF workflow on NULISA

Ascilion PELSA microneedle sampling

Ascilion PELSA microneedle sampling

Ascilion PELSA microneedle sampling

HTA licensed, GCP compliant

HTA licensed, GCP compliant

HTA licensed, GCP compliant

Start with your markers

Send us the markers that matter, your sampling device and your expected volumes. Within one working day you will know which of them ISF can carry and what the volumes allow. A pilot is often the right first step here, and we will say when.

Not every marker list survives that check. Better to find out now than after the cohort is collected.

Send us your marker list

WHY interstitial fluid

Why interstitial fluid matters

We have validated dermal interstitial fluid biomarker quantification on the NULISA platform in direct partnership with Ascilion, a leader in dISF sampling technology.

Most biomarker work runs on plasma, serum or CSF, the well-established matrices conventional immunoassay platforms were designed around. But some of the most informative biology sits in matrices those platforms cannot handle, where ultra-sensitive detection and bespoke validation become the rate-limiting step.


Interstitial fluid is one of those matrices. ISF occupies the extracellular space surrounding cells. It is where cytokines signal, where chemokines recruit immune cells, and where soluble mediators carry information between tissue and circulation.


For decades, measuring those signals at tissue level meant punch biopsy: invasive, painful, scarring, and impractical for repeated or longitudinal sampling. Microneedle-based collection has changed that.


Unlike plasma, which dilutes local signal into systemic circulation, ISF gives direct access to the molecular state of the skin, or any tissue accessible by microneedle.

Inflammatory and immune-mediated skin disease

where local cytokine concentrations far exceed circulating ones.

Longitudinal monitoring

where repeated sampling matters more than the depth of any single sample.

Paediatric studies

where punch biopsy is ethically or practically problematic.

Cosmetics and dermocosmetics

where biopsy is not a viable product-development readout.

Tissue pharmacokinetics and target engagement

where drug levels at the site of action are the question.

Repeated measurement designs

including pre and post intervention and dose-response studies where biopsy cannot reliably be repeated.

the problem

The technical challenge

ISF samples are small, dilute and protein-poor compared with plasma. The cytokines and chemokines of interest typically sit in the femtogram to picogram-per-millilitre range, well below the limit of detection of conventional immunoassays.

Standard ELISA, multiplex bead arrays and conventional electrochemiluminescence platforms cannot resolve inflammatory signal in ISF without sample-concentration steps. Those steps introduce variability and consume material you often cannot spare.

Ultra-sensitive proteomics is a requirement here.

WHY interstitial fluid

Our validated ISF capability

We have validated dermal interstitial fluid biomarker quantification on the NULISA platform in direct partnership with Ascilion, a leader in dISF sampling technology.

Sampling

The validation used samples collected with Ascilion’s PELSA microneedle device.

Analysis

Samples were analysed on the NULISAseq™ Inflammation Panel 250 AQ, Alamar's absolute-quantitation 250-target inflammation panel.

Result

Strong analytical performance across cytokine and chemokine targets that conventional immunoassay platforms cannot resolve in this matrix.

And the wider picture on ISF detectability

Alamar's published detectability data puts interstitial fluid at 235 or more of the 250 targets on the Inflammation Panel 250, above 95%, and 105 or more of the 124 targets on the CNS Disease Panel 120, above 85%.

That makes ISF one of the best-performing alternative matrices on the platform, ahead of saliva, urine, nasal swabs, sputum and stool. For a matrix that until recently could not be analysed at all, that means avoiding the biopsy costs you almost nothing in detectability.

The partnership has also given us hands-on familiarity with device performance, sample-handling protocols and the matrix-specific validation requirements ISF imposes.

Simoa and MSD

Validation in ISF is in active development for both. We will tell you plainly where a platform is validated in this matrix and where it is not.

The immunoassay signal is encoded as a DNA barcode. Nothing is read as colour or light. A countable digital signal scales cleanly to hundreds of targets in one well, without the cross-talk that limits conventional multiplexing.


WHY interstitial fluid

What you gain

Tissue-local biology

Inflammatory and immune signals measured in the extracellular space where they act.

Tissue-local biology

Inflammatory and immune signals measured in the extracellular space where they act.

Minimally invasive collection

Microneedle sampling makes repeated collection practical, in populations and study designs where biopsy is not an option.

Minimally invasive collection

Microneedle sampling makes repeated collection practical, in populations and study designs where biopsy is not an option.

Longitudinal designs

Repeated measurement at the same site over time, which most inflammatory-disease questions require.

Longitudinal designs

Repeated measurement at the same site over time, which most inflammatory-disease questions require.

Ultra-sensitive detection from microvolume input

Absolute quantitation for more than 150 inflammation biomarkers from the volumes microneedle sampling yields. Published detectability in ISF is above 95% of the Inflammation Panel 250, which is higher than most conventional alternative matrices.

Ultra-sensitive detection from microvolume input

Absolute quantitation for more than 150 inflammation biomarkers from the volumes microneedle sampling yields. Published detectability in ISF is above 95% of the Inflammation Panel 250, which is higher than most conventional alternative matrices.

Local and systemic in parallel

Cross-reference ISF signal against plasma from the same subject, to separate tissue-level biology from systemic response.

Local and systemic in parallel

Cross-reference ISF signal against plasma from the same subject, to separate tissue-level biology from systemic response.

Custom development where the target has no assay

We are one of only five laboratories worldwide certified by Alamar for NULISA custom assay development.

Custom development where the target has no assay

We are one of only five laboratories worldwide certified by Alamar for NULISA custom assay development.

Talk to a scientist about your matrix

what to use

Platforms for ISF biomarker work

NULISA · validated

Simoa · validation in development

MSD · validation in development

Bespoke matrix validation

Validated for dISF on the NULISAseq Inflammation Panel 250 AQ, in partnership with Ascilion using the PELSA microneedle device.

Absolute quantitation for more than 150 inflammation biomarkers from microvolume input.

NULISA · validated

Simoa · validation in development

MSD · validation in development

Bespoke matrix validation

Validated for dISF on the NULISAseq Inflammation Panel 250 AQ, in partnership with Ascilion using the PELSA microneedle device.

Absolute quantitation for more than 150 inflammation biomarkers from microvolume input.

What you can measure

Th1, Th2, Th17 and Th22 cytokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-22, IL-31, IFN-γ, TNF-α and others

Chemokines CCL17/TARC, CCL22/MDC, CXCL8/IL-8, CXCL10/IP-10 and others

Soluble immune mediators and barrier proteins

Tissue pharmacokinetics drug concentrations at the site of action

Target engagement and pharmacodynamic markers

Custom biomarkers via NULISAqpcr™ or platform-specific custom development

Typical applications

Inflammatory skin disease

Atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa and other inflammatory skin disease research.

Dermatology drug development

Biologic and small-molecule programmes, including pharmacodynamic and target-engagement biomarkers.

Cosmetics and dermocosmetics

Longitudinal repeated measurement, replacing or supplementing biopsy where biopsy was never a viable product-development readout.

Paediatric dermatology

Studies where biopsy is not appropriate.

Tissue pharmacokinetics

Dermatology and adjacent indications where drug concentration at the site of action is the endpoint.

Local versus systemic biology

Cross-referencing ISF signal against plasma from the same subject.

Sample requirements

  • Collection device: Ascilion PELSA recommended, as our validation used it. Other microneedle systems are fine, so let us know which at scoping.

  • Processing: None needed on site. Freeze as collected.

  • Aliquoting: Single-use aliquots.

  • Freeze and thaw: Keep cycles to a minimum: no more than 3 to 5 for NULISA (panel-dependent), 3 to 4 for Simoa, and 2 for MSD.

  • Storage: −80°C.

  • Shipping: On dry ice, with a manifest listing sample ID, volume, collection date, device and anatomical site.

How much do we need?

Send whatever the device collects, typically 1 to 5 µL. There’s no minimum volume.

At these volumes, samples almost always need diluting. Dilution behaves differently in ISF than in plasma, so we test it on your samples and confirm the usable volume at scoping. This is why ISF studies include a short feasibility step.

Keep the collection site consistent. The anatomical site affects results, so record it and use the same site for each person at every timepoint.

We confirm receipt and sample condition in writing within two working days, before anything is consumed.

Shipping samples internationally

We can arrange collection and shipping, or work with your preferred courier. Either way we confirm the logistics, temperature control and documentation at scoping, before any samples move.

THE ALTHEOME DIFFERENCE

Why partner with Altheome on ISF

Validated dISF biomarker workflows are rare. Ours was built in direct partnership with the company that makes the sampling device.

A validated workflow, not an assumption

Direct experience with the sampling technology

Absolute quantitation

Honest platform status

Bespoke matrix validation

One laboratory

Our dISF capability was validated on PELSA-collected samples with the Inflammation Panel 250 AQ.

THE ALTHEOME DIFFERENCE

Why partner with Altheome on ISF

Validated dISF biomarker workflows are rare. Ours was built in direct partnership with the company that makes the sampling device.

A validated workflow, not an assumption

Direct experience with the sampling technology

Absolute quantitation

Honest platform status

Bespoke matrix validation

One laboratory

Our dISF capability was validated on PELSA-collected samples with the Inflammation Panel 250 AQ.

THE ALTHEOME DIFFERENCE

Why partner with Altheome on ISF

Validated dISF biomarker workflows are rare. Ours was built in direct partnership with the company that makes the sampling device.

A validated workflow, not an assumption

Direct experience with the sampling technology

Absolute quantitation

Honest platform status

Bespoke matrix validation

One laboratory

Our dISF capability was validated on PELSA-collected samples with the Inflammation Panel 250 AQ.

Near-plasma insight, without a needle

Published data shows interstitial fluid outperforms other alternative matrices, with 95% or more of targets detected on a 250-protein inflammation panel.


We have put that into practice, profiling dermal ISF with Ascilion, a leader in ISF sampling, and producing two application notes on inflammation in skin disease. We understand the collection as well as the measurement.

Interstitial fluid is the best-performing alternative matrix in Alamar's published comparison: 95% or more of targets detected on the Inflammation Panel 250, and 85% or more on the CNS Disease Panel 120. That is close to plasma performance from a sample collected without a needle. The figure is Alamar's own.


We have also worked directly with Ascilion, a leader in dermal interstitial fluid sampling technology, so we understand the collection side as well as the measurement..

Discuss your matrix with a scientist

Send us your matrix, volumes, sampling device and the markers that matter.

You will get a straight view on feasibility, platform and timeline before you commit anything, including a no where ISF cannot support the question.

Talk to a scientist about your matrix

Explore custom assay development

You will hear from us within one working day.

You will hear from us within one working day.

Related plataforms
Related capabilities
Related matrices
Related applications

Still curious? Find answers in our FAQ's.

FAQ page

Related plataforms
Related capabilities
Related matrices
Related applications

Still curious? Find answers in our FAQ's.

FAQ page